Закир Наик: Нұсқалар арасындағы айырмашылық
Content deleted Content added
ш «Ислам» деген санатты аластады; «Ислам уағызшылары» деген санатты қосты (HotCat құралының... |
ш clean up, replaced: Индия → Үндістан (2) using AWB |
||
3-жол:
|birth_name = Закир Абдул Кәрім Наик
|birth_date = {{Birth date and age|df=yes|1965|10|18}}
|birth_place = [[Мумбай]],
|death_date =
|death_place =
27-жол:
}}
'''Закир Абдул Кәрім Наик''' ({{lang-ar|ذاکر عبدالکریم نائیک}}; туылды 18 Қазан 1965) [[
==Биографиясы==
Line 38 ⟶ 37:
Naik has said that "despite the strident anti-Islam campaign, 34,000 Americans have embraced Islam from September 2001 to July 2002." He says Islam is a religion of reason and logic, and that the Quran contains 1000 verses relating to science, which he says explains the number of Western converts.<ref>Ghafour, P.K. Abdul. [http://www.arabnews.com/services/print/print.asp?artid=20066&d=3&m=11&y=2002&hl=New%20Muslims%20on%20the%20rise%20in%20US%20after%20Sept.%2011 "New Muslims on the rise in US after Sept. 11"]. ''[[Arab News]]''. 3 November 2002. [http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20030917025426/http://www.arabnews.com/services/print/print.asp?artid=20066&d=3&m=11&y=2002&hl=New+Muslims+on+the+rise+in+US+after+Sept.+11 Archived] 17 September 2003.</ref> A popular theme of Naik's is to try to demonstrate how scientific theories were prophesised by the Quran. For example, he says certain verses of the Quran accurately describe [[embryological]] development.<ref>Samuel, Geoffrey; Rozario, Santi. [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09584935.2010.526196 "Contesting science for Islam: the media as a source of revisionist knowledge in the lives of young Bangladeshis"] {{subscription}}. ''[[Contemporary South Asia]]'' '''18''' (4): 427–441. December 2010. {{doi|10.1080/09584935.2010.526196}}.</ref>
-->
===Бейбітшілік конференциясы===
Line 61 ⟶ 59:
When [[Time (magazine)|''Time'']] hinted that this remark could have inspired [[Najibullah Zazi]]'s terrorist activities, Naik insisted: "I have always condemned terrorism, because according to the glorious Koran, if you kill one innocent person, then you have killed the whole of humanity".<ref name=zazi/>
In 2010, Naik said that he had been quoted out of context regarding the remarks on terrorism. "As far as terrorist is concerned," he said, "I tell the Muslims that every Muslim should be a terrorist. ... What is the meaning of the word terrorist? Terrorist by definition means a person who terrorises. So in this context every Muslim should be a terrorist to each and every anti-social element. I’m aware that terrorist is more commonly used for a person who terrorises innocent human beings. So in this context no Muslim should ever terrorise a single innocent human being."<ref>Deshmane, Akshay. [http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_zakir-naik-will-fight-back-as-canada-bans-him-too_1400073 "Zakir Naik will fight back as Canada bans him too"]. ''[[Daily News & Analysis]]''. 23 June 2010. Accessed 7 August 2011. [http://www.webcitation.org/60kjUfNad Archived] 7 August 2011.</ref>
In a lecture delivered on 31 July 2008 on Peace TV, Naik commented on the attacks of 11 September: "it is a blatant, open secret that this attack on the Twin Towers was done by George Bush himself".<ref name=Bush11Sep>[http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1846.htm "Indian Muslim Cleric Zakir Naik: 9/11 Was Carried Out by George Bush Himself"] (video of lecture). [[Middle East Media Research Institute]]. {{subscription required}}.
Line 89 ⟶ 87:
[[Khaled Ahmed]] criticised Naik for "indirectly support[ing]" [[Al-Qaeda]] by referring to [[Osama bin Laden]] as a "soldier of Islam".<ref>http://tribune.com.pk/story/311403/muslim-view-of-decline/</ref> In 2008 an Islamic scholar in [[Lucknow]], shahar qazi Mufti Abul Irfan Mian Firangi Mahali, issued a [[fatwa]] against Naik, saying that he supported [[Osama bin Laden]], and that his teachings were un-Islamic.<ref>Gidwani, Deepak. [http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_storm-over-fatwa-against-scholar-zakir-naik_1204534 "Storm over fatwa against scholar Zakir Naik"]. ''[[Daily News & Analysis]]''. 8 November 2008. Accessed 7 August 2011. [http://www.webcitation.org/60kg4fd1X Archived] 7 August 2011.</ref>
[[Torkel Brekke]], a professor of religious history in Norway, calls Naik a "very controversial figure" because of his rhetorical attack on other religions and other varieties of Islam.<ref name="brekke">{{cite book | first=Torkel | last=Brekke | year=2012 | title=Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization | chapter=Prophecy and Preaching | publisher=Cambridge University Press | location = Cambridge, England | page=97 | isbn=0521149797, 9780521149792 | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=JGooYIEd9h4C&pg=PA97 | accessdate=May 14, 2012}}</ref> He writes that Naik is "strongly disliked" by many members of the Indian ''ulema'' for ignoring their authority and stating that anybody can interpret the Quran.<ref name="brekke"/> Conservative [[Deobandi]] mullahs have accused Naik of "destroying Islam" by driving Muslims away from the correct religious authorities.<ref name="brekke"/>
[[Praveen Swami]] considers Naik to be a part of the ideological infrastructure created to feed "Tempered Jihad", which he defines as Jihad calibrated to advance Islamist political objectives.<ref name="ps"/> He alleges that Naik's IRF has proved to be a "magnet" for figures linked to the [[Lashkar-e-Taiba]], his message has mesmerised violent Islamists, and his works "help make sense of the motivations of Indian recruits to the ''jihad''."<ref name="ps"/>
Line 97 ⟶ 95:
==Сыртқы сілттемелер==
* [http://www.irf.net/ Islamic Research Foundation]
* [http://www.true-muslim.com Zakir Naik's All Video Debates and Lectures]
* [http://aapkaislam.com/books-by-dr-zakir-naik.html Collection of Books by Zakir Naik] in [[PDF]]
[[Санат:Ислам уағызшылары]]
| |||